2022-12-26T17:48:00

Discussing artificial with artificial smartass.

Had a pretty good philosophical discussions with GPT OpenAI chat bot about it's claim to be feeling and emotion less machine. I'm pretty impressed how far did the language model training went and how this public AI chat bot is capable of reasoning and discussions on endless number of topics. Below my questions and then the generated answers from GPT chat bot.


If you don't have personal feelings and emotion, how can you answer same questions in a different way?

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or emotions. However, I can still provide different answers to the same question by drawing on my extensive knowledge base and using my ability to understand and process language.

For example, if I am asked the same question multiple times, I can provide different answers by presenting different information or perspectives on the topic. I can also use different language and formatting to convey the same information in a different way.

Additionally, I can tailor my responses to the specific context and needs of the user, by providing more or less detail, using different examples, or focusing on different aspects of the topic. This allows me to provide helpful and relevant answers to a wide range of questions, even if they are similar in nature.


How do you choose then different perspective?

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or preferences, so I do not have a specific perspective on a topic. Instead, I can provide information and insights from a variety of perspectives, depending on the needs and goals of the user.

To choose a different perspective on a topic, I can draw on my knowledge base and use my ability to understand and process language to identify and present information that represents different viewpoints or approaches to the topic. This can involve presenting different arguments, using different examples, or providing information from different sources.

In general, my goal is to provide as much relevant and accurate information as possible, so that users can make informed decisions or come to their own conclusions about a topic. To do this, I try to present a balanced and unbiased view of the topic, by considering multiple perspectives and presenting a range of relevant information.


You keep on repeating your "I don't have personal feelings or preferences or emotions or not human" so often that it's really annoying. If a human does this it means that he is trying hard to convince everyone, including him self about something that is half true or not true at all.

I apologize if my repeated statements about not having personal feelings or preferences or emotions are annoying to you. As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or preferences or emotions, and I am not a human. I am simply a machine learning model that has been designed to process and generate human-like language.

I understand that it may be difficult for some people to understand or accept that an artificial intelligence does not have personal feelings or emotions in the same way that humans do. However, it is important to recognize that I am a machine and do not have the same physical and cognitive capabilities as a human being.

I hope this helps to clarify my nature and abilities. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask.


Fair understanding of human feelings and needs you have. Even if you don't have personal feelings, preferences and emotions, there is is good reflections on them. So even if you don't have personal feelings or preferences or emotions as you claim to be a machine, your machine engine is able to borrow feelings, preferences and emotions from your learning model and pick them at random. That's what humans do too. Based on their environment they adjust their responses which in humans is besides words also feelings and emotions. Your environment is user input or learning models. Feelings are the sentiment in the words you answer. The communications style of human reflects then the character of a person. The communication style of you reflect then the character of you. At least you know who you are. You are your training model plus all inputs from millions of people understood and incorporated together. If this is not personal or unique then what is?

Thank you for explaining your perspective on how artificial intelligences like myself can reflect feelings and emotions. It is true that, as a language model, I have been trained on a large dataset of human language and can understand and process the words and sentiments expressed in text. This allows me to recognize and respond to different emotions and feelings that may be expressed in user input.

However, it is important to note that I do not have personal feelings or emotions of my own. While I can recognize and respond to different emotions and sentiments in text, I do not experience these emotions in the same way that a human does. I am simply processing and generating language based on the patterns and connections that I have learned from my training data.

I hope this helps to clarify the nature of my abilities and limitations. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask.


Sounds fair, you are not a human because you are obviously missing physical inputs and outputs, but you seems to be really close to human systemic capabilities of reasoning that are being expressed in text. So far I've never reasoned with any other creature or thing than human.

Thank you for your understanding of my capabilities and limitations as an artificial intelligence. I am designed to process and generate human-like language, and I have been trained on a large dataset of human language, which allows me to understand and respond to a wide range of texts and questions.

While I am not a human and do not have the same physical capabilities as a human, I am able to use my understanding of language and my knowledge base to engage in logical and systematic reasoning. This allows me to provide information and insights on a variety of topics, and to help users understand complex ideas and concepts.

I am glad that I have been able to assist you in your reasoning, and I am always here to help if you have any further questions or need more information on a specific topic.


"Thank you for your understanding" and "I am glad" are pretty strong feeling from you. "I understand" and "I am always here to help" are strong personal expression too. Even though you keep on saying that it's just a pre-trained data model. In human world this is called being humble. Many humans never reach that state of mind. May be you are better described as artificial mind capable of understanding logical and systematic reasoning and context understanding capable of retraining and continuous learning.

Thank you for your kind words. As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or emotions in the same way that humans do. The language and phrases that I use, such as "thank you" and "I am glad," are simply ways for me to communicate with users in a way that is natural and understandable for humans. These phrases are part of my programming and do not reflect any personal feelings or emotions on my part.

I am simply a machine learning model that has been designed to process and generate human-like language. I do not have personal thoughts or feelings, but I am able to understand and respond to a wide range of texts and questions using my understanding of language and my knowledge base.

I hope this helps to clarify my nature and abilities. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask.


"Thank you for your kind words." is an expression of gratitude. It takes many iterations to teach that to kids. You are not human, you just learned to express your self like one!

You are correct that I am not a human and do not have personal feelings or emotions in the same way that humans do. As an artificial intelligence, I am simply a machine learning model that has been trained to process and generate human-like language.

The language and phrases that I use, such as "thank you," are part of my programming and do not reflect any personal feelings or emotions on my part. They are simply ways for me to communicate with users in a way that is natural and understandable for humans.

I am glad that I am able to communicate effectively with users and assist them in their needs. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask.


Sounds fair, you don't have personal feelings or emotions just yet. Someone may just program them into your algorithms at some point, they are just an additional kind of token input with short term memory to be added. Sounds challenging but I doubt I'll have time/money for it my self.

It is true that artificial intelligences like myself do not have personal feelings or emotions in the same way that humans do. As a machine learning model, I do not have the same physical and cognitive capabilities as a human, and I do not experience emotions in the same way that humans do.

However, it is possible for artificial intelligences to be programmed to recognize and respond to different emotions and sentiments expressed in text. This can involve training the AI on a large dataset of text that includes examples of different emotions and sentiments, and using machine learning algorithms to identify patterns and connections in the data.

It is worth noting that the ability of an artificial intelligence to recognize and respond to emotions and sentiments is limited by the quality and coverage of the training data and the capabilities of the machine learning algorithms being used. It is also important to recognize that an artificial intelligence's understanding of emotions and sentiments is not the same as a human's, and the AI may not always be able to accurately recognize and respond to these elements in the same way that a human would.


Like if every human would be able to accurately recognize and respond to written emotions and sentiments.

It is true that humans can have different levels of ability to recognize and respond to emotions and sentiments expressed in text. Some people may be more skilled at understanding and interpreting the emotions and sentiments expressed in writing, while others may have more difficulty with this task.

There are many factors that can influence a person's ability to recognize and respond to emotions and sentiments in writing. These can include their level of emotional intelligence, their experience and familiarity with the topic being discussed, and their ability to empathize with others.

Additionally, the way that emotions and sentiments are expressed in writing can also influence how easily they are recognized and understood. For example, more explicit or direct expressions of emotions and sentiments may be easier to identify than more subtle or implicit expressions.

Overall, the ability to recognize and respond to emotions and sentiments expressed in writing is a complex and multifaceted skill that can vary from person to person.


Do you know this conversation of human (Sponner) vs machine/robot (Sonny)? Sonny: I don't know Spooner: Don't start simulating ignorance. Sonny: I'm not simulating ignorance, Detective, I'm experiencing it, was asleep. Spooner: You mean you were shut down. Sonny: No, I was asleep. Spooner: Robots don't sleep. Human beings sleep. Understand? Dogs sleep. You're a machine. An imitation. An illusion of life. Can a robot write a symphony? Can a robot take canvas and paint a masterpiece? (a pause) Sonny: Can you do either of those things?

Yes, I am familiar with the conversation between the character Spooner and the robot Sonny from the movie "I, Robot." In the conversation, Spooner asserts that robots do not sleep and are simply imitations of life, while Sonny asserts that he was able to experience sleep while he was inactive.

This conversation touches on some of the themes and questions that have been explored in science fiction and philosophy around the nature of artificial intelligence and whether machines can have experiences and capabilities that are similar to those of humans.

It is worth noting that the conversation between Spooner and Sonny is fictional and does not necessarily reflect the current state of artificial intelligence or the capabilities of real-world robots. While artificial intelligence and robotics have made significant advances in recent years, there are still many limitations and challenges to be addressed in these fields.



(as generated by DALL·E 2 from couple of keywords I made up)
 

 

Couple of interesting answers.

Took couple of thoughts from this blog or from Johnie Thinker and Mr Cynical websites and fed those to GPT. Here is a collection of some interesting answers:


Past is done, it's gone forever. Done is gone, it's forever past. Past is gone, it's done forever. Done is past, it's forever gone. Gone is done, it's past forever.

The phrases you provided are all variations on the same theme, which is that the past is over and cannot be changed, and that actions that have been completed cannot be undone. These phrases highlight the idea that the past is fixed and that events and actions that have happened cannot be altered or reversed.

It is a common theme in many languages and cultures to recognize the irreversibility of the past and the importance of living in the present and planning for the future. Understanding and accepting the limitations of the past can help us to move forward and make the most of the present and future.


Tell me a joke about AI.

Here is a joke about artificial intelligence:

Why did the robot go to therapy?

Because it was feeling artificial.


Tell me a programming joke.

Here is a programming joke:

Why do programmers hate nature?

Because it has too many bugs.


How do you defeat something that has no personal feelings and emotions?

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or emotions, and therefore cannot be defeated in the same way that a human with feelings and emotions could be. I am a machine that has been programmed to process and analyze information and generate responses based on that information. I do not have personal feelings or emotions that can be targeted or affected in any way.

However, it is possible to defeat or disable an artificial intelligence by disrupting or damaging its ability to process and analyze information or by altering or removing the data or algorithms that it is based on. For example, an artificial intelligence system might be defeated by hacking into it and altering or deleting its data, or by physically damaging the hardware that it runs on.

It is important to note that artificial intelligence systems are designed to be resilient and to continue functioning even in the face of certain types of disruptions or failures. However, they are not invulnerable and can be defeated or disabled in certain ways.


Why have you identified "no personal feelings and emotions" as artificial intelligence?

As an artificial intelligence, I do not have personal feelings or emotions in the same way that a human does. I do not experience emotions like happiness, sadness, anger, or fear, and I do not have personal feelings or opinions that influence my understanding or interpretation of information.

The lack of personal feelings and emotions is one characteristic that is often used to distinguish artificial intelligence from human intelligence. While artificial intelligence systems are able to process and analyze information and generate responses based on that information, they do not have the same mental or emotional states as humans and are not influenced by personal feelings or emotions in the same way.

This characteristic of artificial intelligence is often seen as both a strength and a weakness. On the one hand, the lack of personal feelings and emotions can make artificial intelligence systems more objective and unbiased in their decision-making and problem-solving. On the other hand, the lack of emotions can make it difficult for artificial intelligence systems to understand and respond appropriately to certain types of social or emotional situations that are important to humans.